[skynet]

If I were to ask you what comes to mind when I say that a mentally retarded young man who had no great experience shooting guns, killed the woman he was living with, armed himself to the teeth with an assault rifle, handguns, the works... took the woman's car, went to a place where no police were present, a place where helpless, innocent human beings were gathered and he entered the room shooting with professional military accuracy, killing 30 people. This occurred within a few months of the President's election, he needed the political and popular support to sign into law an assault weapons ban he had previously could not do until this tragedy took place...

What comes to mind?

No not Newtown, Connecticut.

Port Arthur Massacre, Australia in 1996.

Too many similarities to dispel as coincidence. Think what you want...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Port_Ar...nment_Reaction



1996 Port Arthur, Australia - Martin Bryant, IQ = 60 --- Kills 30+ with 90% headshots!


2012 Newtown, Connecticut - Adam Lanza, Aspergers or Some other Retardation 27 kills with high accuracy.



Ah but where it differs is, the Port Arthur tragedy was supposed to end with Bryant dying, the house he was holed up in caught fire mysteriously, and his burn wounds suggest he was laying down on his face unconscious, he woke up and ran out of the house and the cops arrested him. Newtown of course ended like most USA shootings, the gunman kills himself but like Port Arthur, I'm sorry to offend anyone but truly due to disguises and ski-masks being worn, no one can positively identify the shooter. But where do these "gunmen" get the training to fire so accurately?

And the smoking gun, pardon the pun, at Port Arthur was Nick Nightengale, one of the first victims stood up and his final words in this world weren't, "please don't shoot..." or "stop" he says "NOT IN HERE." It was later suggested that Nightengale was a former Australian military intelligence agent, former, active, does it matter? Who steps in front of a guy with an assault rifle shooting people and says "NOT IN HERE"

The fact of the matter is Bryant was said to have bought a ticket for the ferry out to the island, suggesting that was going to be his target, but showed up 10 minutes late. He had said to someone "I'm going to Port Arthur to shoot WASPS" meaning American tourists. It just so happens on the ferry he missed were 30 American elderly tourists. He missed target 1, and just like a military operation, he had a secondary target and it explains Nick Nightengale trying to stop him by saying "NOT IN HERE"

Newtown, there was POSITIVELY a guy in the woods running from police, wearing camo pants, an adult witness was interviewed and said "They caught a guy in the woods and he's sitting in front of the cop car right there." But oddly the news cameraman didn't feel the need to turn his camera around and shoot the camouflage wearing mystery man watching the Sandy Hook shooting unfold from the woods sitting IN FRONT OF THE POLICE CAR. Since when does a guy running from the police, put under arrest in front of a police car. Back to Port Arthur, many people say Bryant was heard talking to someone on the phone while talking to police when he was holed up in the house, literally another voice was heard but no one else was found in that house.

This whole thing just stinks. And Lanza's father is a Vice President at GE Financial? That's a major government linked company.

[skynet]

One last thing I overlooked:


Martin Bryant, a 28-year-old from New Town, Tasmania

[OrionX]

At least I'm not the only one thinking this way. I was listening to the scanner earlier and there was an armed robbery at the CVS by Kohl's and the perp escaped into the darkness... it made me think about how we're all sheep in this state at the mercy of criminals with guns they didn't buy legally.

So what's my point: mainly it's not to kick down doors and take away guns of the 99.999999% of responsible gun owners that never commit a crime with their guns they legally buy which would cause a civil war and put millions of people and law enforcement in direct danger. No doubt, let's do our best to keep guns out of the hands of psycho's, do background checks, lock guns up with biometric or other high tech solutions, not even the NRA and gun owners would argue that... so what's the argument? What is this war on guns going to be about? TAKING AWAY ALL GUNS FROM EVERYONE? Big mistake pal, not surprising, Clinton tried HARD to do that, now Obama is going to finish the job.

But back to the image being shared... The Israeli's do this very thing, policemen and soldiers are stationed in every school in Israel and there's only been 1 school shooting in their history and it was at a school soldiers were not present, and that was a terrorist attack by Hamas, not a dickless psycho with no cause, possibly a false flag mind controlled psyop agent, but still no excuse either way. Do we have shooting sprees at schools in America where cops are present? Someone made the argument to me the other day, friend of a friend on Facebook, that a cop with a handgun is no match for a guy with an assault rifle... but what's more important? Looking at the rare and hypothetical showdown between a cop with a handgun vs. an untrained psycho with an assault rifle? Or looking at the hard data points to the fact that criminals (and wacko spree shooters) avoid places where cops are in the first place.

Talk to any cop, rarely do they have a problem with people who are registered firearm owners, its always a guy who got the gun illegally, stole it, whatever

[Toscani]

I know this Port Arthur Massacre story well.

Let's not forget that no one who claimed to have encountered Martin Bryant on the day of the shooting could positively identify him as the shooter, not the tollbooth attendant, not the people who survived his shooting, not even the guy who video taped him coming out of the cafe.

No one could positively say Martin Bryant was the shooter, the first time he is identified through audio is during the time he was in the cottage and talking to police on the phone which he acted like he was in a trance, almost oblivious to the fact he had just conducted the biggest and most accurate shooting massacre in the history of the world. I don't know if they heard another person in the room with him, but I remember specifically that at some point in the conversation with police he acted like he was getting fed things to say to the police. And of course the first time anyone positively saw Bryant was when he came out of the house in flames and was arrested. I don't buy it.

Columbine was similar, I think witnesses said they saw up to 7 different gunman and a bomb thrower in and around the school wreaking havoc but only Harris and Kliebold were found dead, suspiciously, like Kleibold's brains were splattered on Harris' left leg and was dead on his left, but the gun he used to kill himself was in his right hand. IMPOSSIBLE, Staged scene.

Newtown, Sandy Hook, I don't want to speculate but they see two guys running from the school just as cops arrive... Is it possible Lanza was shot by these mystery men, his "controllers" and was labelled the lone gunman? He was in disguise after all, no one saw his face... just like Columbine was fishy, Port Arthur was impossible (a retarded kid shot 30 shots and 29 hits mostly all to the head), and now Sandy Hook Elementary? And all of these events result in stricter Gun Laws... 20 kids died, which was miserable, and awful, but 20 kids die each week in car crashes, 20 kids died last week in an Obama sanctioned drone attack... how rare is a school shooting? Too rare to change the constitution of the United States?

[USMC]

Newtown Connecticut/Sandy Hook Elementary Massacre compared to Port Arthur Massacre

Similarities
Newtown Suspect: Mentally Ill Gunman in his 20's
Port Arthur Suspect: Mentally retarded gunman in his 20's
Newtown Suspect Military Experience: None
Port Arthur Suspect Military Experience: None
Newtown Suspect Weapons Handling Experience: Little to None
Port Arthur Weapons Handling Experience: Little to None
Newtown Eyewitnesses: None can positively say the suspect shot any weapons
Port Arthuer Eyewitnesses: None can positively say the suspect shot any weapons, just a man in with blonde hair like Bryant
Police response in Newtown: Not present but quick enough to make suspect "lose his nerve" and shoot himself
Police response in Port Arthur: Conspicously absent, they're usually on duty but were not present, in fact were given a tip about a "drug deal" 10 miles away at the same time, the tip turned out to be anonymous and false... odd.
Newtown Guns Used: A Bushmaster rifle and two handguns
Port Arthur Guns Used: Colt AR-15 very similar to the Bushmaster, in the same class


Port Arthur time, Read that wiki article: All of these events, from the first bullet that killed Ng, took approximately 15 seconds, during which 12 people were killed and 10 more were wounded.
That's some serious commando skill with a semi automatic weapon! 12 fatal shots and 10 more hits, NO MISSES in 15 seconds? Incredible. On cheat mode in Call of Duty I can't do that well. All bullox of you ask me or anyone that's fired an assault rifle, the accuracy, the speed, the determination suggest military training that far exceeds basic military training.

Another thing about Port Arthur, bizarrely the Hobart coroners office ordered a truck that can hold up to 20 dead bodies at a time for transport a few months before the massacre took place. A county that sees less than 1 homicide per year needs a truck that transports 20 dead people at once? Of course a year later when questions arose about that truck, it was missing, but everyone saw it that day, there's even photos of it at work outside the cafe.

Honestly it sounds suspicious, Newtown especially, a kid that's on a rampage shooting everyone in sight doesn't choose to combat the police? Or what's more plausible, whoever was with adam lanza shot him and ran from the scene, multiple witnesses report men running from the school without weapons. Let's just spitball here, 3 men, 3 guns, 28 people dead sounds more likely than 1 man with 3 guns, and the 2 that got away dropped their guns at Lanza's feet.

[USMC]

Columbine was similar, I think witnesses said they saw up to 7 different gunman and a bomb thrower in and around the school wreaking havoc but only Harris and Kliebold were found dead, suspiciously, like Kleibold's brains were splattered on Harris' left leg and was dead on his left, but the gun he used to kill himself was in his right hand. IMPOSSIBLE, Staged scene.

Totally, when I saw the picture of Kleibold and Harris dead on the floor I said that doesn't look right...

The official story is either they both shot themselves or one shot the other before shooting himself, but that doesn't explain away how Kleibolds brains are splattered on top of Harris' leg as if he was shot from the right side of the frame... he had a shotgun in his right hand but his final action in the world was shooting himself on the left side of his head so his brains end up on the right side of his body on his BFF's leg? Totally contrived scene.

So, what really happened AT LEAST is the cops entered the library where they were found, they surrendered but were executed by the police. If you don't want to believe that, then there were more gunmen involved that killed them instead, but either way the story stinks, and the photographic evidence supports that the official story like always is bull****. Either that or he didn't even have a gun and the police just threw it in for the picture, which suggests the police were in on making them look like they both had guns for whatever reason. It just doesn't make much sense if you hear the official story.